Zum Inhalt springen

Overview: convergence criteria

Aus Wikibooks
Decision tree for convergence and divergence of series

We already introduced a series k=1ak as the sequence of the partial sums Sn=k=1nak. A sequence is convergent, if the sequence of partial sums is convergent . Else the series is divergent. Assuming the series is convergent we define the value of the infinite sum of the series k=1ak to be equal to the limit of the sequence.

In this chapter we will study different criteria or tests to determine whether a series is convergent or not. In further chapters, we will study each of this criteria more attentively and give a proof for each.

Criteria for convergence

[Bearbeiten]

We will give a proof for the following propositions in the respective main article for the criterion. Let a series k=1ak be given. There is an arsenal of criteria to examine convergence:

Absolute convergence

[Bearbeiten]

Main article: Absolute Konvergenz einer Reihe

Definition (Absolute convergence)

A series k=1ak is called absolutely convergent, if k=1|ak| is convergent.

Theorem (Absolute convergence)

If a series is absolutely convergent, it is also convergent. So if k=1|ak| is convergent, then k=1ak is also convergent.

Example (Absolute convergence)

The series k=1(1)k1k2 is convergent, because it is absolutely convergent. The series of absolute values k=1|(1)k1k2|=k=11k2 is convergent.

Cauchy criterion

[Bearbeiten]

Main article: Cauchy-Kriterium für Reihen

Theorem (Cauchy criterion)

For all ε>0 let there be N, so that |k=mnak|<ε for all nmN. Then the series is convergent.

Example (Cauchy criterion)

The geometric series k=1(110)k is convergent according to the Cauchy criterion, because:

|k=mn(110)k|=|(110)m+(110)m+1+(110)m+2++(110)n|=|(110)m||1+110+1102++110nm|=110m|1+0,1+0,01+0,001+110nm|=110m1,1111111(nm)-mal110m2

Let ε>0. Since limm210m=0 there is N with 210m<ε for all mN. For this N it follows from the above that |k=mn(110)k|<ε for all nmN. So we see that the series is convergent according to the Cauchy criterion.

Leibniz criterion

[Bearbeiten]

Main article: Leibniz-Kriterium

Theorem (Leibniz criterion)

If the series has the form k=1(1)kbk and if the sequence (bk)k non-negative monotonic decreasing sequence null sequence , then the series is convergent.

Example (Leibniz criterion)

The convergence of the series k=1(1)k12k1 follows from the Leibniz criterion, because the sequence (12k1)k is a non-negative monotonic decreasing null sequence.

Majorant criterion

[Bearbeiten]

Main article: Majorantenkriterium und Minorantenkriterium

Theorem (Majorant criterion)

Let |ak|bk for all k. If k=1bk is convergent, then the series k=1ak is absolutely convergent.

Example (Majorant criterion)

We have 12k+k3+712k. Since the series k=112k is convergent (with limit 1), the series k=112k+k3+7 is also (absolutely) convergent.

Ratio test

[Bearbeiten]

Main article: Quotientenkriterium

Theorem (Ratio test)

Let k=1ak be a series with ak0 for all k. If there exists a θ<1 and a N, so that |ak+1ak|θ for all kN, then the series k=1ak is absolutely convergent. This is particularly the case, if limk|ak+1ak|<1 or lim supk|ak+1ak|<1.

Example (Ratio test)

The series k=11k! is convergent, since we find that:

limk|ak+1ak|=limk|1(k+1)!1k!|=limkk!(k+1)!=limk1k+1=0<1

Root test

[Bearbeiten]

Main article: Wurzelkriterium

Theorem (Root test)

If lim supk|ak|k<1, then the series k=1ak is absolutely convergent. In particular this is also true if limk|ak|k<1.

Example (Root test)

The series k=03k is absolutely convergent, because we have:

lim supk|ak|k=lim supk|3k|k=lim supk31=limk31=13<1

Cauchy condensation test

[Bearbeiten]

Main article: Cauchysches Verdichtungskriterium

Theorem (Cauchy condensation test)

Let (ak)k1 be a monotonically decreasing, real valued null sequence with ak0 for all k. If l=02la2l is convergent, so is k=1ak).

Example (Cauchy condensation test)

The series k=11k2 is convergent according to Cauchy condensation test, because the series l=02l(12l)2=l=012l=l=0(12)l is convergent. Recall that l=0al is convergent if |a|<1 (here we have a=12<1).

Integral test

[Bearbeiten]

Theorem (Integral test)

Let k=1ak=k=1f(k), i.e. ak=f(k) for a function f:[1,). If f is a monotonically decreasing function with non-negative values on the domain [1,) and if 1f(x)dx<, then the series is absolutely convergent.

Example (Integral test)

The series k=11k2 is absolutely convergent. We define f:[1,) with f(x)=1x2. This function is a non-negative monotonically decreasing function, and now we can use the Integral test:

11x2dx=lima1a1x2dx=lima[1x]1a=lima(1a+1)=1<

Hint

We will give a proof that the Integral test works, after we have introduced Integrals. But for completeness purposes we listed it here. Please note that you can use this test only if it was proved in your lecture!

Criteria for divergence

[Bearbeiten]

We are given a series k=1ak. To show that this series is divergent, there are multiple criteria:

Term test

[Bearbeiten]

Main article: Trivialkriterium, Nullfolgenkriterium, Divergenzkriterium

Theorem (Term test)

If (ak)k diverges or limkak0, the the series is divergent.

Example (Term test)

The series k=1(k+1k)k is divergent, because we have:

(k+1k)k=(1+1k)k1

Thus ak=(k+1k)k cannot be a null sequence, which proves that k=1(k+1k)k diverges.

Cauchy Test

[Bearbeiten]

Main article: Cauchy-Kriterium für Reihen

Theorem (Cauchy-Kriterium)

If there is an ϵ>0, so that for all N there exist natural numbers n~m~N with |k=m~n~ak|ϵ, then the series is divergent.

Example (Cauchy Test)

The series k=11k is divergent according to the Cauchy test. Set ϵ=14. For every N we choose m~=N+1 and n~=2N. We then have:

|k=m~n~1k|=|k=N+12N1k|=1N+1+1N+2++12N12N+12N++12N=N12N=12ϵ

Minorant criterion

[Bearbeiten]

Main article: Majorantenkriterium und Minorantenkriterium

Theorem (Minorant criterion)

Let akck0 for almost all k. If k=1ck diverges, then also the series k=1ak diverges.

Example (Minorant criterion)

The series k=11k is divergent, since we have 1k1k for all k, and the harmonic series k=11k is divergent. In equations:

k=11kk=11k=

Quotient test

[Bearbeiten]

Main article: Quotientenkriterium

Theorem (Quotient test for divergence)

If |ak+1ak|1 for almost all kN (i.e. for all kK for fixed K), then the series k=1ak diverges. In particular this is the case whenlimk|ak+1ak|>1.

Example (Quotient test for divergence)

The series k=1k!2k is divergent. Since we have:

limk|ak+1ak|=limk|(k+1)!/2k+1k!/2k|=limk(k+1)!2kk!2k+1=limkk+12=>1

Square root test

[Bearbeiten]

Main article: Wurzelkriterium

Theorem (Square root test)

If lim supk|ak|k>1, the the series k=1ak is absolutely divergent. In particular, this is the case when limk|ak|k>1.

Example (Square root test)

The series k=12kk diverges, because we have:

lim supk|ak|k=lim supk|2kk|k=lim supk2kkkk=lim supk2kk limkkk=1=2>1

Cauchy condensation test

[Bearbeiten]

Main article: Cauchysches Verdichtungskriterium

Theorem (Cauchy condensation test)

Let (ak)k be a monotonically decreasing real-valued null sequence with ak0 for all k. If l=02la2l diverges, then also k=1ak diverges.

Example (Cauchy condensation test)

The series k=11k diverges, because 1k is a monotonically decreasing null sequence and the series l=02l12l=l=01 diverges.

Integral test

[Bearbeiten]

Theorem (Integral test)

Let k=1ak=k=1f(k), so ak=f(k) for a function f:[1,). If f on [1,) is a monotonically decreasing non-negative function, and if 1f(x)dx=, then the series is divergent.

Example (Integral test)

The series k=11k is divergent, because f:[1,) with f(x)=1x is a monotonically decreasing non-negative function, and we have:

11xdx=lima1a1xdx=lima[ln(x)]1a=lima(ln(a)ln(1))=limaln(a)=

Convergence is independent from starting index

[Bearbeiten]

In the section about the Cauchy test we saw that the starting index is irrelevant for the study of convergence. If we have a series of the form k=1ak, then we could also consider the series k=10ak or k=4223ak. The only differences is the starting index k. This series all have the same convergence behaviour. So remember:

„If we remove or alter only finitely many members of the series, then the convergence behaviour doesn't change.“

If we remove or alter finitely many summands, the individual values of the series will change of course, but the convergence behaviour stays the same. This fact is useful, you should always keep it in the back of your head. This could be useful in those cases, where you are not interested in the exact values of the series, but only if it converges or not.

Example

Let (ak)k be defined as follows:

ak={10k;k100012k;k>1000

Almost all members of the sequence (ak)k are identical to (12k)k (only finitely many exceptions). Since the series k=112k is convergent, the series k=1ak is also convergent, but the exact value of the limit is not the same.