Exercise (Accumulation points)
Determine all accumulation points of the sequences with and .
Exercise (Lim inf and Lim sup)
Determine Lim inf and Lim sup of the sequences with and .
Solution (Lim inf and Lim sup)
- As , we have . Hence, is bounded from below. then equals the smallest accumulation point of the sequence . For the subsequence holds that
Therefore, is an accumulation point of . There can't be other accumulation points, as all other subsequences of our sequence either converge to or diverge. Hence, we have .
Alternative solution: We have , as the odd sequence elements of monotonically decrease to . It follows that
With , we get
The archimedean property then states that there exists a with for all . Therefore, is not bounded from above and .
- Regarding : We have
Hence, only has the accumulation points and . Furthermore, is bounded, as all subsequences are bounded as well. We get and .
Solution (Lim inf and Lim sup 2)
-
Let be a positive sequence with
We need to show the following inequalities:
W.l.o.g. let and . By definition, is the smallest and the largest accumulation point of the sequence . Hence, for all () there exists an with
Applying the inequality times setting , for an arbitrary with holds that:
The expression in the middle is a telescoping product. Except for the numerator and the denominator , everything cancels out.
Multiplying and taking the -th root leads to
With , the term on the left side converges to and the one on the right side converges to for . Therefore, we get
und
As can be chosen arbitrarily small, we get
and
As the inequality holds by definition, the claim follows.
-
- For all we have , as the numerator and denominator are always positive. Hence, 0 is a lower bound of the quotient sequence . With being odd and even, it follows that
for
Hence, there exists a subsequence of the quotient sequence converging to zero. It follows that
- With being even and being odd, we get
for
Hence, the quotient series doesn't have an upper bound and
- With being odd, we have
and being even leads to
Hence, has the accumulation points and . It follows that
and
-
As , we get
Using 1) and Der Sandwichsatz, we have
It follows that .
-
1st limit: Let . It follows that
Using part 3, we have .
2nd limit: Let . It follows that
Again using 3., we get .
Hint
Take a look at the inequalities proven in subtask 1. In subtask 2 even holds that
Hint
Taking a look at the limits from subtask 4 and using reciprocals, we get:
Solution (Cauchy criterion for sequences)
Subtask 1: We will show that is a Cauchy sequence. The Cauchy criterion then states that converges. Using the assumptions made, we have:
If and , there exists a with . It follows that
From the inequalities follows that
From the archimedean axiom we can derive that for all there exists an such that for all holds
Hence, is a Cauchy sequence and therefore convergent.
Subtask 2: For the sequence holds true that
With , the criterion from subtask 1 is met. Hence, converges.
The limit can be computed as follows: Analog to subtask 1 - but without taking the absolute values -, we have
Applying the formula times leads to
Hence, we get
Using the computation rules for limits, we have